Bright Ideas
Volume 2. Issue 3. June 2005

The Woolbright Group

In this Issue:

print this newsletterprinter friendly version of this newsletter


Help Us Clean House!

We hope you have enjoyed the past issues of The Woolbright Group newsletter – and want to continue receiving it.

It’s our intention to send our newsletter only to those colleagues who wish to receive it. If you value our publication, please help us do a little house-cleaning of our database and confirm your subscription!

You will be receiving a newsletter subscription confirmation e-mail in the next few days. Please be sure to follow the e-mail instructions to confirm your subscription. If you do not respond to the e-mail, you will no longer receive Bright Ideas.

Thanks for your help!


Tell a friend...


Development Job Opportunities

Through William Spelman Executive Search, the following development positions are available:

  • Dean College,
    Franklin, MA; Vice President for Institutional Advancement

For more information, please visit the William Spelman Executive Search website.


 

Tell a friend...

 

Dynamite Donor Visits:
An Interview with Joanne Singh

Part I: Getting the Appointment

Joanne Singh has more than 20 years of experience in development including positions at Smith College and Hollins University. She is currently the Associate Vice President for Development at Berea College. In addition to her managerial duties, she continues to meet individually with several donors per month.

The Woolbright Group spoke with Joanne on how to identify prospects for visits, get appointments, and overcome ‘cold call’ fear.

WG: How do you decide who warrants a personal visit?

JS: Berea Fund gift officers focus on donors of $200 or more in the hope of moving them up to a gift club level. They also visit those who have been supporting Berea for many years at more modest levels. These folks may be planned giving or bequest prospects, and bequests can account for up to 60% of our fund raising in a given year. We always visit single or widowed donors with no children. We also visit children of major donors or of loyal alumni whose children clearly benefited from their parents’ Berea education—whether or not these children have given—in the hope that a commitment to Berea will continue with the next generation.

Major gift officers attempt to visit anyone determined to have capability. Because of Berea’s history as the first coeducational and interracial college in the south and distinctive mission to seek and accept only students who cannot afford to pay tuition, we acquire new non-alumni donors all the time. Our research staff checks online resources immediately when first time donors appear on the daily gift report. They alert gift officers when a modest gift is coupled with promising research.

WG: What do you say when you call for an appointment?

JS: I tell donors I’m calling for two reasons: 1) to thank them for their support of Berea’s mission and students and 2) to let them know that I will be traveling for Berea to their area the week of X and hope there might be a mutually convenient time when we could meet to talk about Berea. I do not give my title or department unless asked.

WG: Do you find that a development title is a liability when trying to get an appointment?

JS: It could be, but of course we are always completely open about the purpose of our visit. Our gift officers have dual titles: major gift officer or Berea Fund gift officer and assistant to the president. Some use “assistant to the president” when calling. Since most solicitations, formal acknowledgments, and stewardship reports go over our president’s signature, a request for a visit from an “assistant to the president” carries weight.

WG: How do you break the ice when making a so-called ‘cold call?’

JS: When calling for an appointment, you have only a few seconds to begin to convince the person at the end of the line that you are someone he or she would want to invite into his or her personal space, whether home or office. One of my very successful colleagues attributes his success to a positive, friendly, casual manner of conversation.

I’ve found that “Berea College” usually elicits a positive reaction. Building some other connection in the first few sentences also helps. If I am calling New England, I quickly tell the person that I am a native New Englander who moved to Kentucky only because of Berea’s mission and reputation, and that I have found it to be everything I expected—and much more.

Also, it is likely that the donor may recognize the name of the officer who calls.

WG: Why is that?

JS: Building personal connections often begins before the phone call for the visit. All gift officers review new gifts each day and write personal notes of thanks to the donors assigned to us and to new donors in our assigned geographic regions. In addition, once or twice a year, usually around some “good news” at Berea such as a positive article appearing in a national publication, our stewardship and communication writers develop a cover letter that gift officers can personalize and send with the particular article or news release to any donors and prospects we choose. So it is likely that the person being called for a visit has heard from us once or twice before.

WG: What other forms of communication do you find helpful to secure the appointment?

JS: We also use e-mail to set appointments, even first appointments. I use “Greetings from Berea” as the subject line, and introduce myself a little more completely in the body of the e-mail. I have rarely been turned down when someone answers my e-mail, but even a refusal by e-mail provides the opportunity for more “conversation.” I thank the donor for responding, provide a little more information about what’s happening on campus, and let the donor know when I might be returning to his or her area.

These e-mail exchanges can set the stage for future requests for visits and provide future opportunities for communicating happenings on campus. Some folks, especially those who are relatively shy, are more likely to agree to a visit once they feel somewhat acquainted with you. They might agree on the second or third attempt. For this reason, unless the donor says “no visits,” I indicate that I will try again on a future trip.

WG: What are the most common objections to meeting and how do you overcome them?

JS: Most often reluctance to be visited comes from a donor’s fear that I am 1) making the trip for the sole purpose of seeing him or her, which puts a burden on the donor to make it “worth my while” or 2) coming to ask for a much larger gift than in the past. Responses vary from “I hate to have you come all this way just to see me,” and “I’m sure that you have other more important folks to see,” to “Let me tell you right up front that I am not planning to increase my gift.” My responses are 1) I’ll be in your immediate area and would welcome a chance to thank you in person for investing in the lives of our students, or 2) Thank you for your candor. However, our friends are important to us, and it is the Berea way to thank them in person whenever possible.

WG: What advice do you give development officers who find it daunting to pick up the phone and ask a donor for an appointment?

JS: A colleague of mine says it best: “Don’t think of the visit as inconveniencing the donor in any way; instead, think of the visit as an opportunity for the donor to learn more about the worthy cause they support. Your visits help provide donors with fulfillment and a deeper connection to the cause.”

In our next issue: Joanne recounts some of her most memorable donor visits and discusses how to make the most of personal meetings.

Interested in staff training or coaching on donor outreach? Contact The Woolbright Group at info@woolbrightgroup.com or 585.787.0325.


 

Go E! E-mail Solicitations and Online Giving in Ten Steps

By Sylvia Racca, Executive Director, Dartmouth College Fund

Developing an internet solicitation strategy to complement direct mail and telemarketing has allowed the Dartmouth College Fund to increase online gifts from a nominal amount a few years ago to $1 million annually. Here are ten tips for integrating an online giving program into your current solicitation strategy:

  1. Security first – Setting up the infrastructure of a program is not necessarily simple or inexpensive. Hire the help you need. Look for strong recommendations from other non-profit institutions of qualified and experienced systems consultants.

  2. Staff to support the effort – A successful program requires, ideally, in-house expertise in web design and technology. In addition, remember that every e-mail solicitation is an opportunity for a prospect to respond with a question or concern. Establish the staffing to manage email communications in a timely fashion. Don’t waste this opportunity to have dialogues with your constituency!

  3. Advertise, advertise, advertise – Never send out printed material without the suggestion of making a gift online with a web address that takes donors directly to your online gift page.

  4. Target, target, target – Incorporate some e-mail solicitations into your annual solicitation schedule. However, be judicious in how you do this. A very fine line separates a donor-focused e-mail solicitation program from spam. Spam is mass solicitation via e-mail. A donor-focused e-mail solicitation program solicits those donors who respond well to such a vehicle. Identify those individuals either by asking them or through their previous online giving patterns. Target your constituency on their preferences, not on whether they have an e-mail address or not.

  5. Be timely – E-mail allows you to communicate a time-sensitive message to a specific constituency. For example, at the end of the fiscal year, the Dartmouth College Fund sends an e-mail to everyone who has given every year since graduation but has not given in the current fiscal year.

  6. Be legal – Learn and comply with laws that govern mass e-mails. Check state laws and learn more about the Federal Can-Spam law.

  7. Consider perks – Encourage online giving by offering a gift to anyone who gives through your website. For example, Dartmouth offers a DVD of animation clips that were designed by Dartmouth students. Take into account staff time needed to manage the incentive program and be sure to consider IRS regulations regarding quid pro quo substantiation and disclosure.

  8. Be brief – Keep e-mail solicitations short. Use the subject line to catch people’s attention. Be careful about including a specific ask amount in an e-mail. Donors sometimes take greater offense to larger ask amounts in e-mail messages.

  9. Beware of being too fancy – Although animated graphics are fun and tempting, be very careful about using them. They can take a long time to load on a dial-up connection. This it antithetical to the value of e-mail solicitations and online giving which are meant to be convenient and efficient

  10. Keep e-mail solicitation in its place – E-mail provides another way – but not the only way – to communicate with prospects. Think of it as a tool to complement direct mail, telemarketing, and personal solicitations, but don’t expect it to take the place of these approaches. Use it judiciously and prospects will respond.

 

Surviving (and Thriving) During a Staff Vacancy

The departure of a key staff member can take a toll on you, your team, and your program. When faced with a staff vacancy, take time to recognize some of the common mistakes managers make and set a course for navigating a staff transition smoothly.

Common Mistakes

Moving too fast – A staff vacancy creates extra work for you and your team. Don’t let desperation to cover the workload lead to hasty (and poor) hiring decisions.

Asking too much – Overburdening your staff with extra duties during a vacancy is a quick path to burnout and additional departures. Some well-intentioned supervisors contribute to this inadvertently by not taking complete control of the transition process – never fully realizing the scope of the departing employee’s responsibilities or having explicit conversations about how the work will be handled. Good, dutiful employees may take on extra work without being asked, sometimes at the price of their own morale.

Asking too little – Attempting to navigate a staff transition without calling on other employees can leave you with too little time to focus on the important work of recruiting and hiring the best possible candidate. This deprives other employees of opportunities for professional growth that can come through taking on new responsibilities and projects temporarily. Stretched too thin, you may also be unable to supervise and support your staff adequately in their ongoing responsibilities.


Take Control of the Situation

First, develop a complete list of the departing employee’s tasks and projects – ideally, the departing employee will assist in this process. When this is not possible, ask the departing worker’s colleagues.

Put some of the work on hold – after compiling a complete list of the departing employee’s tasks and projects, determine the highest priorities. Which tasks and projects cannot wait? You’ll find that some time sensitive, high priority tasks must be tackled during the transition, but other tasks can and should be tabled until a new employee is in place.

Consider (with caution) appointing someone internally to assume the vacated role on an interim basis. This strategy is tricky. A competent up and comer might have his or her eye on the job and may hope that strong performance on an interim basis will lead to the role on a permanent basis. If this is how it works out, great. However, if you decide to hire someone else for the role, you may end up losing a good ‘second’ in the department. Remember that shifting someone into the role on an interim basis may leave his or her ongoing responsibilities inadequately covered. Priorities in both jobs will need to be considered carefully along with the impact on other staff, some of whom may believe themselves to be capable of taking on the new position. Interim appointments, however, can work well when there is clearly one best candidate to assume the position with support from other staff.

Consider dividing up the workload among staff members. What is the potential for junior staff to take on specific tasks during the transition? Can you get the work done while giving junior staff members a chance to stretch their abilities, develop new skills, and prove themselves?

Consider retaining outside assistance – Finding a temporary replacement can be hard when the position requires a certain skill set and level of experience. Outside consultants can sometimes be good options to assume the interim role or to cover key tasks (e.g. the annual giving appeal process). Consultants can even offer more intensive support, supervision, and coaching to remaining staff than you might be able to provide while you search to fill the vacancy.

Need help navigating a staff transition? Contact The Woolbright Group at info@woolbrightgroup.com or 585.787.0325.



The Woolbright Group
23 Captain’s Cove Lane; Webster, NY 14580
Telephone: 585.787.0325
info@woolbrightgroup.com ** www.woolbrightgroup.com


A member of Council for Advancement and Support of Education (CASE) and the Association of Fundraising Professionals (AFP).